9 research outputs found

    Towards Cognizant Hearing Aids: Modeling of Content, Affect and Attention

    Get PDF

    Combining Semantic and Acoustic Features for Valence and Arousal Recognition in Speech

    No full text

    Combining Semantic and Acoustic Features for Valence and Arousal Recognition in Speech

    No full text
    Abstract-The recognition of affect in speech has attracted a lot of interest recently; especially in the area of cognitive and computer sciences. Most of the previous studies focused on the recognition of basic emotions (such as happiness, sadness and anger) using categorical approach. Recently, the focus has been shifting towards dimensional affect recognition based on the idea that emotional states are not independent from one another but related in a systematic manner. In this paper, we design a continuous dimensional speech affect recognition model that combines acoustic and semantic features. We design our own corpus that consists of 59 short movie clips with audio and text in subtitle format, rated by human subjects in arousal and valence (A-V) dimensions. For the acoustic part, we combine many features and use correlation based feature selection and apply support vector regression. For the semantic part, we use the affective norms for English words (ANEW), that are rated also in A-V dimensions, as keywords and apply latent semantics analysis (LSA) on those words and words in the clips to estimate A-V values in the clips. Finally, the results of acoustic and semantic parts are combined. We show that combining semantic and acoustic information for dimensional speech recognition improves the results. Moreover, we show that valence is better estimated using semantic features while arousal is better estimated using acoustic features

    Top-down attentionwith features missing at random

    No full text

    How efficient is estimation with missing data?

    No full text

    HOW EFFICIENT IS ESTIMATION WITH MISSING DATA?

    No full text
    ABSTRACT In this paper, we represent a new evaluation approach for missing data techniques (MDTs) where the efficiency of those are investigated using listwise deletion method as reference. We experiment on classification problems and calculate misclassification rates (MR) for different missing data percentages (MDP). We compare three MDTs: pairwise deletion (PW), mean imputation (MI) and a maximum likelihood method that we call complete expectation maximization (CEM). We use synthetic dataset, Iris dataset and Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. We train a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) with missing at random (MAR) data. We test the trained GMM for two cases, in which test dataset is missing or complete. The results show that CEM is the most efficient method in both cases while MI is the worst of the three. PW and CEM prove to be more stable with respect to especially higher MDP values than MI
    corecore